Why does israel have a right to exist

This is wrong. Israel does have a right to exist. This right is clearly mentioned in UN Resolutions , and In , the International Court of Justice declared that the wall built by Israel in the West Bank was illegal, but it also declared that Israel had the right to exist.

Second of all, there is no unlimited right of return for Palestinian refugees. Resolution says clearly that the resolution of the refugee issue ought to take into account the right of all states in the region to exist in peace and security.

And Resolution takes precedence over other resolutions, because the UN Security Council voted on it, and the General Assembly resolutions have much less legal clout. Interestingly enough, there would be a way to reconcile the right of return with the existence of Israel, in the form of a confederation with open borders.

Such a framework would allow both Palestinians and Israelis to live and move across the border while remaining citizens of their respective states. However, the BDS movement has condemned this initiative and forced a movement calling for a Palestinian-Israeli confederation to cancel its inaugural event in the West Bank. The Palestinians do not need to change their narrative to do so. They just need to recognize that the Jews who settled in Palestine did not conquer this land to enrich themselves, which is usually the purpose of a colonial invasion.

No state has inherent legitimacy. Nonetheless Hamas, like the PLO before it, is expected to make such a unique acknowledgement before it can even enter peace negotiations, and before the boundaries of the state it is expected to recognise are settled and internationally accepted. Hamas would be acknowledging the legitimacy of the dispossession of the Palestinian people from their homeland. Why would they ever want to concede this, let alone as a precondition for peace negotiations?

It would amount to a pre-emptive surrender. This appears to have been part of a political strategy. By raising the threshold test beyond the point that any Palestinian group could accept, the Israelis and Americans were preventing serious negotiations towards a settlement of the conflict from proceeding.

Today they are still demanding of a political party something that has never before been required of any state. It would be comprised of disconnected cantons even on the West Bank, pocketed with Israeli cities and crossed by Israeli roads. Did Czechoslovakia have a right to exist?

How about the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies? The Confederacy? Human beings have a right to exist, and to live flourishing lives. When one fails to do this for enough of those people for a long enough time, those national configurations sometimes end up being renegotiated peacefully or otherwise , and the idea that, as a point of principle, this is always unjust is very strange.